Labor & Employment Law — 11/06/09

Eaton’s Neck Fire District, EEOC settle class age bias suit for $213,840

Eaton’s Neck is located in Western Suffolk County, on the North Shore of Long Island, New York. The Fire District refused to let volunteer firefighters over age 65 accrue credit toward a “length of service award” (LOSAP), the equivalent of a retirement pension, because of their age, the EEOC’s suit alleged (No 08-5089). As a result, senior firefighters lost pension amounts after they turned 65, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the EEOC asserted.

Peter Farrell, who passed away in September 2008, filed the initial EEOC charge. His widow, Bernadette Farrell, said from her home in Olympia, Washington, “My husband brought this EEOC charge because he felt as though the older firefighters were not being given the compensation they deserved and that they were being overlooked based on their age. He felt justified in bringing his matter forward and he was looking forward to having it settled for the benefit of everyone in a fair manner. We are pleased that Peter’s efforts led to this resolution for all of the affected firefighters and their families. I know Peter would have been sincerely pleased with this equitable outcome.”

“This fire department’s system in effect penalized older firefighters because of their age, and that was simply illegal,” said EEOC Acting Chairman Stuart J. Ishimaru. “We welcome the fire district’s decision to settle this case in a way that ensures that these brave firefighters, who do heroic work, do not receive different retirement benefits simply because of their age.”

EEOC Senior Trial Attorney Sunu P. Chandy added: “It is honorable when people like Peter Farrell have the courage to pursue their civil rights, both in terms of standing up for their own dignity and furthering the cause of justice on behalf of their colleagues. The EEOC appreciates people like Mr. Farrell who bring these kinds of issues forward to our agency’s attention so that the federal government can vigorously pursue these matters in the benefit of the public interest.”

NetNews

Free Email Newsletter

In Focus

Supreme Court Oral Argument in Materiality Case Notes Deference Due to SEC

Assistant U.S. Solicitor General Pratik Shah contended that the SEC is due significant deference based on its long-standing historical practice of applying the materiality standard and its special expertise with respect to what a reasonable investor would want to know.